In exclusive clinical partnership with KPCIRC
OnKommon

Cancer Dictionary · Central nervous system

Glioma and Glioblastoma

The classification of adult diffuse glioma was rebuilt around molecular features. IDH status and 1p/19q codeletion define the three main adult types, and a tumour that looks like one entity under a microscope may be classified as another once molecular results arrive. MGMT promoter methylation is a separate, treatment-relevant test.

Also called Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, GBM.

Start here

The governing idea

Adult glioma classification is now molecular by definition: a diagnosis cannot be made properly without IDH and 1p/19q status, so molecular testing is part of naming the disease rather than an addition to it.

The classification of adult diffuse glioma was rebuilt around molecular features. IDH status and 1p/19q codeletion define the three main adult types, and a tumour that looks like one entity under a microscope may be classified as another once molecular results arrive. MGMT promoter methylation is a separate, treatment-relevant test.

01Before any molecular question

How it usually presents

Usually established first: imaging characteristics, tumour location and the extent of any resection. Neurological function and its likely trajectory are central to every decision in this disease, and sit alongside the oncological discussion rather than after it.

Usually already established

  • Imaging characteristics and tumour location
  • Extent of resection
  • IDH status
  • 1p/19q status where relevant
  • MGMT promoter methylation status

02

Major disease categories

The divisions below are not labels. Each one changes what the treatment discussion is actually about.

Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant

Graded 2 to 4. A distinct entity from IDH-wildtype glioblastoma despite overlapping appearances.

Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted

Defined by both features together. Neither alone is sufficient for the diagnosis.

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype

Grade 4 by definition. The most common and most aggressive adult glioma.

Paediatric-type gliomas

Classified separately, with distinct alterations including BRAF fusions and histone alterations. Can occur in young adults.

Other CNS tumours

Meningioma, ependymoma, medulloblastoma and CNS lymphoma are separate diseases with their own molecular classifications.

03What is discussed

Molecular considerations

IDH1 and IDH2 mutation status is the first branch point in adult glioma classification. 1p/19q codeletion, together with IDH mutation, defines oligodendroglioma. ATRX loss and TP53 alteration support the astrocytoma designation. MGMT promoter methylation is a separate epigenetic test that carries treatment relevance in glioblastoma. EGFR amplification, TERT promoter alteration and chromosome 7 gain with chromosome 10 loss are features that can establish a glioblastoma diagnosis even in a tumour that looks lower grade. BRAF V600E and BRAF fusions appear in specific glioma types, and NTRK and FGFR alterations occur less commonly.

Biomarkers commonly discussed

IDH1 and IDH2

The first branch point in adult glioma classification, and now a treatment target in lower-grade disease.

1p/19q codeletion

Together with IDH mutation, defines oligodendroglioma. Both are required.

MGMT promoter methylation

An epigenetic marker, not a mutation. Treatment-relevant in glioblastoma.

ATRX and TP53

Support the astrocytoma designation.

EGFR amplification, TERT, +7/-10

Molecular features that can establish glioblastoma even where the histology looks lower grade.

BRAF

V600E and fusions, in specific glioma types and more often in younger patients.

This is not an exhaustive list, and which markers are relevant depends on the individual case. Not every marker listed is assessed in every patient.

04What is tested, and from what

Testing, inherited risk and blood-based monitoring

Genomic testing considerations

Molecular testing in glioma is part of making the diagnosis, not an optional extra, and current classification cannot be applied without it. Tissue comes from surgery or biopsy. Methylation profiling is increasingly used in difficult cases and in paediatric-type tumours to resolve diagnoses that histology alone cannot. Because the blood-brain barrier limits shedding, plasma-based testing is much less useful here than in other cancers.

Germline considerations

Most glioma is sporadic. Inherited syndromes including Li-Fraumeni (TP53), neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, Lynch syndrome and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency are recognised. Very young onset, multiple primary tumours, or a striking family history are the usual prompts. Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency in particular is worth considering in a child or young adult with a high-grade glioma and characteristic skin findings.

Cancer genetics and hereditary risk

ctDNA and liquid biopsy considerations

Plasma ctDNA is much less informative in brain tumours because the blood-brain barrier limits how much tumour DNA reaches the circulation. Cerebrospinal fluid is a more informative compartment and is under active study, particularly for CNS lymphoma and leptomeningeal disease.

More on ctDNA monitoring

05The timing question

When molecular information matters

Testing that arrives after the decision it was meant to inform has already been made is a common and avoidable problem. This is the sequence in which molecular information tends to become relevant.

  1. At surgery or biopsyTissue for molecular classification is obtained here. The diagnosis is not complete without it.
  2. Before treatment planningIDH status, 1p/19q status and MGMT methylation all inform what follows and are needed before decisions are made.
  3. Where histology and behaviour disagreeMolecular features can reclassify a tumour, sometimes upward in grade.
  4. At progressionRepeat sampling is discussed, and distinguishing true progression from treatment effect on imaging is a recognised difficulty.

06Take these to your team

Questions worth raising

When a decision is being made

Questions worth raising with a treating team.

  • Has IDH status been established, since the whole classification rests on it?
  • Where oligodendroglioma is suspected, has 1p/19q codeletion been confirmed alongside IDH mutation, since both are required?
  • Has MGMT promoter methylation been tested, and is it understood to be a separate test from mutation profiling?
  • Do the molecular features change the grade assigned on histology alone?
  • Have neurological function and its likely trajectory been discussed alongside the oncological plan?

At progression, recurrence or resistance

The molecular picture at diagnosis is not always the molecular picture later.

  • Is apparent progression on imaging true progression, or treatment effect, since the distinction changes everything and is genuinely difficult?
  • Has repeat sampling been considered where the distinction cannot be resolved on imaging?
  • Has the molecular profile been reassessed, since IDH-mutant tumours can transform over time?

07What shapes eligibility

Clinical trial considerations

Eligibility is written almost entirely in molecular terms: IDH status, 1p/19q status, MGMT methylation, grade and prior therapy. An incomplete molecular diagnosis prevents assessment against most glioma trials.

Ask about trial matching

Plain-language glossary for this entry (5 terms)
TermWhat it means
IDHA metabolic enzyme. Mutations in it define a distinct and generally slower-growing group of gliomas.
1p/19q codeletionLoss of parts of two chromosomes together. Required, with IDH mutation, to diagnose oligodendroglioma.
MGMT promoter methylationA chemical modification that switches off a DNA repair gene, making certain treatment more effective.
PseudoprogressionImaging changes after treatment that look like tumour growth but are not.
Methylation profilingA test that classifies tumours by their pattern of chemical DNA modifications rather than by mutations.

Where OnKommon fits

These are the services most often relevant to this cancer. Which of them applies is a clinical question, not an automatic one.

Related entries

This entry is educational. It describes what is commonly discussed in this cancer, not what should happen for any individual. Which of it applies depends on the specific diagnosis, stage, prior treatment and the person themselves. Nothing here is a recommendation, and no list of biomarkers here is exhaustive. Decisions belong with a treating team who know the whole case.

Take the next step

Three ways forward. Pick the one that fits today.

01

Book a free consultation

A no-obligation conversation with our care team, arranged through KPCIRC.

Book a consultation
02

Begin Blueprint Care

Commission your decision report and a dedicated clinical team.

Explore Blueprint Care
03

Ask on WhatsApp, free

Signal replies to your first question within four hours, at no cost.

Start with Signal