In exclusive clinical partnership with KPCIRC
OnKommon

Cancer Dictionary · Gynaecological

Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer is separated by histological subtype, and high-grade serous carcinoma dominates both in frequency and in how the molecular discussion is framed. DNA repair capability, specifically homologous recombination, is the organising molecular idea. Germline testing is discussed for all patients with the relevant histology rather than being triggered by family history.

Also called Epithelial ovarian cancer, High-grade serous carcinoma, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer.

Start here

The governing idea

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is the disease where homologous recombination status is most central, and where the germline question is raised for essentially everyone rather than only for those with a family history.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is separated by histological subtype, and high-grade serous carcinoma dominates both in frequency and in how the molecular discussion is framed. DNA repair capability, specifically homologous recombination, is the organising molecular idea. Germline testing is discussed for all patients with the relevant histology rather than being triggered by family history.

01Before any molecular question

How it usually presents

Usually established first: histological subtype and grade, stage, and whether surgery has achieved complete cytoreduction. Ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer are frequently grouped together because they behave similarly.

Usually already established

  • Histological subtype and grade
  • Stage, and the completeness of any cytoreductive surgery
  • Whether germline testing has already been offered
  • CA-125 trend, where it is being followed

02

Major disease categories

The divisions below are not labels. Each one changes what the treatment discussion is actually about.

High-grade serous

The most common subtype, characterised by near-universal TP53 alteration and frequent homologous recombination deficiency. The subtype in which the molecular discussion is most developed.

Low-grade serous

Biologically distinct, slower growing, with MAPK pathway alterations such as KRAS, NRAS and BRAF more prominent.

Clear cell and endometrioid

Distinct biology again, with ARID1A and PI3K pathway alterations discussed, and an association with endometriosis.

Mucinous

Uncommon, and behaves more like a gastrointestinal cancer in several respects, including which markers are discussed.

03What is discussed

Molecular considerations

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are central, both as inherited and as tumour-only findings. Beyond them, homologous recombination deficiency describes a broader functional state that can arise from other genes in the same pathway or be measured as a genomic scar signature. TP53 alteration is near-universal in high-grade serous disease and is diagnostic rather than actionable. In low-grade serous disease, KRAS, NRAS and BRAF dominate. ARID1A and PI3K pathway alterations appear in clear cell and endometrioid subtypes. Mismatch repair deficiency is uncommon but assessed, particularly in non-serous subtypes.

Biomarkers commonly discussed

BRCA1 and BRCA2

Central to both the germline and the tumour discussion. The distinction between the two matters for relatives.

HRD

Homologous recombination deficiency. A functional state, measured by a scar signature rather than by one gene.

TP53

Near-universal in high-grade serous disease. Supports the diagnosis rather than opening a treatment.

KRAS, NRAS, BRAF

More relevant in low-grade serous disease than in high-grade.

ARID1A

Associated with clear cell and endometrioid subtypes.

MMR / MSI

Uncommon in serous disease, more relevant in endometrioid and clear cell subtypes.

This is not an exhaustive list, and which markers are relevant depends on the individual case. Not every marker listed is assessed in every patient.

04What is tested, and from what

Testing, inherited risk and blood-based monitoring

Genomic testing considerations

Two questions are usually asked in parallel: is there an inherited alteration, and does the tumour show homologous recombination deficiency? They are answered by different tests, on different samples, and the germline answer has implications for relatives that the tumour answer does not. Timing matters because the results are relevant to decisions made after initial treatment rather than months later.

Germline considerations

Germline testing is discussed for all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer regardless of family history, because the prior probability is high enough that family history is an unreliable filter. A germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 finding has direct implications for the patient and opens a cascade testing pathway for relatives, who may be able to act on the information before any cancer develops. Lynch syndrome genes are also relevant, particularly in non-serous subtypes.

Cancer genetics and hereditary risk

ctDNA and liquid biopsy considerations

Plasma testing is less established here than in lung or breast cancer, in part because tissue is usually available from surgery. Serial ctDNA is under study for detecting recurrence earlier than CA-125 and imaging, and the same question applies as elsewhere: what would be done differently with an earlier signal.

More on ctDNA monitoring

05The timing question

When molecular information matters

Testing that arrives after the decision it was meant to inform has already been made is a common and avoidable problem. This is the sequence in which molecular information tends to become relevant.

  1. At or soon after diagnosisGermline testing is discussed for essentially all patients with epithelial disease, not only those with a family history.
  2. Around the completion of first-line treatmentHomologous recombination status informs decisions about what follows initial treatment, so the result needs to arrive before that point.
  3. For relativesA germline finding opens a cascade testing pathway. Relatives can act on the information before any cancer develops.
  4. At recurrenceThe interval since last treatment is central, and reassessment of molecular status is discussed alongside it.

06Take these to your team

Questions worth raising

When a decision is being made

Questions worth raising with a treating team.

  • Has germline testing been offered, given that it is discussed for all epithelial ovarian cancer rather than only where there is a family history?
  • Has homologous recombination status been assessed, and by what method?
  • Is the histological subtype high-grade serous, since much of the molecular discussion is specific to it?
  • Will the result be available in time to inform decisions made after initial treatment?
  • If a germline finding is made, has a cascade pathway for relatives been discussed?

At progression, recurrence or resistance

The molecular picture at diagnosis is not always the molecular picture later.

  • Has the interval since the last platinum-based treatment been considered, since it shapes the whole recurrence discussion?
  • Has the molecular profile been reassessed at recurrence, particularly where the original testing was narrow?

07What shapes eligibility

Clinical trial considerations

Homologous recombination status, prior treatment sequence, and the interval since last treatment are the criteria that most commonly determine eligibility. Histological subtype is also frequently specified, and low-grade serous disease has its own distinct trial landscape.

Ask about trial matching

Plain-language glossary for this entry (5 terms)
TermWhat it means
High-grade serousThe most common subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, and the one most of the molecular literature refers to.
Homologous recombinationA high-fidelity DNA repair mechanism. When it fails, cells become dependent on other, more error-prone routes.
HRD scoreA measurement of the genomic damage left behind by failed repair, used as a functional readout rather than a single gene test.
Cascade testingOffering testing to relatives once an inherited alteration is found in the family.
CytoreductionSurgery aimed at removing as much visible disease as possible.

Where OnKommon fits

These are the services most often relevant to this cancer. Which of them applies is a clinical question, not an automatic one.

Related entries

This entry is educational. It describes what is commonly discussed in this cancer, not what should happen for any individual. Which of it applies depends on the specific diagnosis, stage, prior treatment and the person themselves. Nothing here is a recommendation, and no list of biomarkers here is exhaustive. Decisions belong with a treating team who know the whole case.

Take the next step

Three ways forward. Pick the one that fits today.

01

Book a free consultation

A no-obligation conversation with our care team, arranged through KPCIRC.

Book a consultation
02

Begin Blueprint Care

Commission your decision report and a dedicated clinical team.

Explore Blueprint Care
03

Ask on WhatsApp, free

Signal replies to your first question within four hours, at no cost.

Start with Signal