In exclusive clinical partnership with KPCIRC
OnKommon

Cancer Dictionary · Gastrointestinal

Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterised by KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 alterations in most cases. The value of comprehensive profiling lies in identifying the minority of tumours with DNA repair deficiency, a fusion, mismatch repair deficiency or an uncommon KRAS variant. Germline testing is discussed for all patients, not only those with a family history.

Also called Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC.

Start here

The governing idea

Most pancreatic cancer carries the same small set of alterations, none of which is easily targetable, which makes the profiling discussion about finding the minority with something actionable rather than expecting to.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterised by KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 alterations in most cases. The value of comprehensive profiling lies in identifying the minority of tumours with DNA repair deficiency, a fusion, mismatch repair deficiency or an uncommon KRAS variant. Germline testing is discussed for all patients, not only those with a family history.

01Before any molecular question

How it usually presents

Usually established first: whether the tumour is resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced or metastatic. This resectability classification, rather than stage alone, organises the treatment discussion. Biliary obstruction and nutritional status are often immediate practical concerns.

Usually already established

  • Resectability classification
  • Histological confirmation, often from a fine needle aspirate with limited tissue
  • CA 19-9 level, where it is being followed
  • Performance status, which strongly shapes what treatment is feasible

02

Major disease categories

The divisions below are not labels. Each one changes what the treatment discussion is actually about.

Resectable

Surgery is potentially curative, and the sequencing of treatment around it is the main discussion.

Borderline resectable

A category defined by the tumour’s relationship to nearby blood vessels, where treatment may be given first to make surgery possible.

Locally advanced, unresectable

Systemic treatment leads, with radiation discussed in some settings.

Metastatic

The setting where profiling most often changes the treatment discussion, in the minority with an actionable finding.

03What is discussed

Molecular considerations

KRAS alteration is present in the large majority, most commonly G12D, G12V or G12R, with G12C being uncommon in this disease. TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 alterations are also frequent and are not directly actionable. The findings that change the discussion are less common: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and other homologous recombination genes; NTRK, NRG1, ALK and RET fusions; mismatch repair deficiency; and, in the small group that lacks KRAS alteration entirely, a markedly higher chance of an actionable finding. That last point is worth knowing: KRAS wild-type pancreatic cancer is the group where comprehensive profiling is most likely to change something.

Biomarkers commonly discussed

KRAS

Altered in most cases. Its absence is itself informative and prompts a wider search.

BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2

DNA repair genes. Relevant both as tumour findings and as inherited risk.

MMR / MSI

Uncommon, but changes the discussion substantially where present.

NTRK, NRG1, ALK, RET

Fusions. Rare, enriched in KRAS wild-type tumours, and need a panel that reads fusions.

TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4

Frequent and characteristic. Descriptive rather than actionable.

This is not an exhaustive list, and which markers are relevant depends on the individual case. Not every marker listed is assessed in every patient.

04What is tested, and from what

Testing, inherited risk and blood-based monitoring

Genomic testing considerations

Comprehensive profiling and germline testing are both discussed for advanced disease. The practical difficulty is tissue: pancreatic diagnoses are often made on a fine needle aspirate that yields very little material, and profiling failures from insufficient tissue are common. Plasma testing is a frequent alternative or complement for that reason. Timing matters because treatment usually needs to start promptly.

Germline considerations

Germline testing is discussed for all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma regardless of family history, because the prior probability is high enough that family history is an unreliable filter. Relevant genes include BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CDKN2A, the Lynch syndrome genes and STK11. A finding changes the patient’s treatment discussion and opens surveillance options for relatives, which in this disease is a meaningful offer given how late it is usually found.

Cancer genetics and hereditary risk

ctDNA and liquid biopsy considerations

Plasma testing is used where tissue is inadequate, which is common in this disease. Pancreatic cancer can shed relatively little ctDNA, so a negative plasma result needs to be read with that in mind rather than as evidence of absence.

More on ctDNA monitoring

05The timing question

When molecular information matters

Testing that arrives after the decision it was meant to inform has already been made is a common and avoidable problem. This is the sequence in which molecular information tends to become relevant.

  1. At diagnosisGermline testing is discussed for all patients, not only those with a family history. It is easy to defer and then never revisit.
  2. Before systemic treatment in advanced diseaseComprehensive profiling is discussed, with realistic expectations about how often it changes the plan.
  3. Where KRAS is wild-typeThis is the group most likely to have an actionable finding, and warrants broader profiling including fusions.
  4. At progressionReassessment is discussed, particularly where the original testing failed for tissue reasons.
  5. For relativesA germline finding opens surveillance discussions for family members.

06Take these to your team

Questions worth raising

When a decision is being made

Questions worth raising with a treating team.

  • Has germline testing been offered, given that it is discussed for all patients with this diagnosis?
  • Was there enough tissue for profiling, and if the attempt failed, has plasma testing been used instead?
  • If KRAS is wild-type, has broader profiling including fusions been done, since that group has a much higher chance of an actionable finding?
  • Has DNA repair status been assessed, both on the tumour and in the germline?
  • Are expectations set realistically about how often profiling changes the plan in this disease?

At progression, recurrence or resistance

The molecular picture at diagnosis is not always the molecular picture later.

  • Has profiling been repeated or completed if the original attempt failed for tissue reasons?
  • Have trial options been reviewed at each treatment change, given the limited standard options?

07What shapes eligibility

Clinical trial considerations

Trial activity is substantial and includes KRAS-directed agents, DNA repair approaches, stromal and immune strategies. Performance status is frequently a limiting eligibility criterion in this disease, which is an argument for considering trials earlier rather than later.

Ask about trial matching

Plain-language glossary for this entry (4 terms)
TermWhat it means
Resectable and borderline resectableCategories describing whether surgery is possible, based on the tumour’s relationship to nearby blood vessels.
Fine needle aspirateA sampling method that yields cells rather than a tissue core. Often too little material for genomic profiling.
KRAS wild-typePancreatic cancer without a KRAS alteration. Uncommon, and much more likely to have an actionable finding.
Performance statusA measure of how well someone is functioning day to day. It strongly influences what treatment is feasible.

Where OnKommon fits

These are the services most often relevant to this cancer. Which of them applies is a clinical question, not an automatic one.

Related entries

This entry is educational. It describes what is commonly discussed in this cancer, not what should happen for any individual. Which of it applies depends on the specific diagnosis, stage, prior treatment and the person themselves. Nothing here is a recommendation, and no list of biomarkers here is exhaustive. Decisions belong with a treating team who know the whole case.

Take the next step

Three ways forward. Pick the one that fits today.

01

Book a free consultation

A no-obligation conversation with our care team, arranged through KPCIRC.

Book a consultation
02

Begin Blueprint Care

Commission your decision report and a dedicated clinical team.

Explore Blueprint Care
03

Ask on WhatsApp, free

Signal replies to your first question within four hours, at no cost.

Start with Signal